Friday, August 15, 2008

why is mongoamy not for queers?

love this definition:

monogamy: 3. (zoology) the habit of having only one mate at a time

so, in my research and just day-to-day experience with the folks who proclaim monogamy, i see large flaws in this concept. i couldnt see how and why any good queer would describe themselves as being monogamous even if they were in a full-time committed sexually exclusive relationship with only one other being.

monogamy: 1. the practice or state of being married to one person at a time.

if your queer and dating the same sex you already fall out of this definition. no matter how much you and your partner protest you fit into monogamy more like in definition 3. And may i add, you are only seen as spectacles, confused zoo animals that need to be re-caged so you can properly mate :)

now, definition 2. monogamy: the practice or state of having a sexual relationship with only one partner.

now, what is sex exactly? is sex the thing men and women do to have babies? then again you faggots are left out. is it sex if "he" puts "it" in "she's" ass? scandalous! is it sex if she puts on her harness straps in her dildo and fucks his ass until he screams her name from sheer ecstasy?

i really could go on and on, but i think your with me.

intimacy a simple word, filled with lots of depth.
but this blog isnt about intimacy its about monogamy.

now, being that sex is an elusive word that really says a lot of nothing about the situation definition 2 begins to fall short.

but this blog is becoming a thesis proposal and not a cute quirky blurb on why monogamy is not for queers so i think i'll stop now.


No comments: